Ecocide

Ecocide, a word that defines the crimes committed against the planet

The concept of ecocide is not new, but from 2021 it has a legal definition. Specifically, "any unlawful or arbitrary act perpetrated in the knowledge that it is highly likely to cause serious, extensive or lasting damage to the environment". Its creators, a panel of 12 jurists from civil society, are seeking to have the crime incorporated as the fifth crime against peace in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Environmental crimes already have a legal definition and the aim is that they can be judged at the International Criminal Court.
Environmental crimes already have a legal definition and the aim is that they can be judged at the International Criminal Court.

During the Vietnam War, the US military used defoliants — chemicals that caused leaves to fall off trees — as a weapon to prevent Vietcong guerrillas from hiding. It is estimated that up to 76 million litres of herbicides and defoliants were dropped on Vietnamese soil, including the highly harmful Agent Orange, causing an ecological catastrophe that will take years to reverse.

In 1972, at the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment held in Stockholm, Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme became the first head of government to use the term "ecocide" to describe the large-scale destruction of the natural environment in Vietnam. More than half a century later, the concept has evolved thanks to the efforts of civil society and, above all, the work of an international panel of 12 legal experts who have given it a legal definition with the aim of having the International Criminal Court recognise it as the fifth crime against peace under the Rome Statute.

What is ecocide?

The international panel of legal experts that recently established a legal definition of ecocide defines it as "unlawful or wanton acts committed with knowledge that there is a substantial likelihood of severe and either widespread or long-term damage to the environment being caused by those acts". When presenting the proposal, Philippe Sands, one of the panel members, explained that every word of the definition had been carefully considered so that it would be neither too vague nor too specific, with the aim of securing the broadest possible support from countries for its inclusion in the International Criminal Court.

Is ecocide an environmental crime?

At present, ecocide is not recognised as an international crime under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which currently covers genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and the crime of aggression. However, in recent years there has been growing international debate about the need to recognise ecocide as a new international crime in order to prosecute the most serious forms of environmental harm.

According to Philippe Sands, the key to considering an environmental crime as ecocide lies in the meaning of some of the words that make up the definition. In this regard, the preamble explains the following:

  • "Arbitrary" means an act of recklessness in respect of damage that would be manifestly excessive in relation to the expected social or economic benefit.
  • "Serious" means damage that causes significant adverse change, disturbance or harm to any element of the environment, including effects on human life or economic, cultural or natural resources.
  • "Extensive" means damage that goes beyond a limited geographical area, transcends state borders or affects an entire ecosystem, a species or a large number of human beings.
  • "Lasting" means damage which is irreversible in nature or which cannot be repaired by natural regeneration within a reasonable period of time.

The proposal to recognise ecocide as an international crime therefore seeks to establish greater accountability for those responsible for arbitrary, severe, widespread or long-term environmental destruction. Its aim is to strengthen the protection of ecosystems and provide legal mechanisms to address actions that threaten the balance of nature and the wellbeing of present and future generations.

Some countries have already taken steps to recognise the concept within their domestic legal systems. Vietnam became the first country to include ecocide in its criminal code in 1990, followed by several others. In 2024, Belgium became one of the first European Union Member States to incorporate it into its criminal legislation. In addition, the European Union adopted new legislation on environmental crime in 2024, strengthening the prosecution of certain offences that cause serious environmental damage.

Types of ecocide

According to Stop Ecocide, the leading NGO fighting for the recognition of ecocide as a crime, these are some examples of what could be judged as such:

  • Damage to the oceans

    Caused by industrial overfishing, oil spills, pollution from plastics, etc.

  • Deforestation

    As a result of intensive livestock farming and agriculture, arson, mining, etc.

  • Water and soil pollution

    From chemical spills, mining related activities, hydraulic fracturing (fracking), etc.

  • Air pollution

    Due to emissions from large industries, nuclear disasters, radioactive releases, etc.

Historical cases of ecocide

While the definition of ecocide is not yet universally recognised, a number of environmental disasters that have occurred over recent decades could be considered examples of ecocide.

Industrial pollution

  • Chernobyl disaster (1986). The explosion of one of the reactors at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant released a vast quantity of radioactive material into the atmosphere – estimated to be around 500 times greater than that released by the Hiroshima atomic bomb – creating a radioactive cloud that spread across much of Europe.
  • Deepwater Horizon oil spill (2010). An accident on the Deepwater Horizon offshore oil rig triggered one of the largest marine oil spills in history. The slick spread across more than 149,000 km² and is estimated to have contaminated up to 1,770 km of coastline.
  • Environmental degradation in the Niger Delta (since the 1970s). After decades of largely uncontrolled oil extraction in the Niger Delta, repeated oil spills have polluted water supplies and devastated agricultural land. As a result, many local communities have been left with few natural resources in an area already affected by widespread poverty.

Destruction and degradation of ecosystems

  • The disappearance of the Aral Sea (1960s–present). Located in Central Asia, it is one of the greatest known environmental catastrophes. Decades of diverting the water from the two rivers that supplied it, the Sir Daria and the Amu Daria, left the world's fourth largest inland sea almost dry.
  • Deforestation of the Amazon (1970s–present). Often described as the "lungs of the planet", the Amazon rainforest has lost an area of forest roughly equivalent to the size of France since 1970, largely as a result of the direct and indirect impacts of cattle ranching and unsustainable logging.

Armed conflicts with environmental impacts

  • Destruction of the Kakhovka Dam (2023). The destruction of the Kakhovka Dam during the war in Ukraine caused catastrophic flooding, devastated river ecosystems, polluted water resources and inflicted severe damage on biodiversity in the Dnipro River basin. The incident reignited international debate over recognising ecocide in the context of armed conflict.

Extreme events intensified by climate change

  • Canada's wildfires (2023). Canada experienced the worst wildfire season in its recorded history, with millions of hectares of forest destroyed. In addition to the loss of biodiversity and widespread ecosystem damage, the fires released vast quantities of carbon dioxide, while smoke severely affected air quality across much of North America and even reached Europe.

Consequences of ecocide

The consequences of ecocide can last for decades, affecting both the natural environment and human wellbeing. The destruction of ecosystems, biodiversity loss, soil degradation, water pollution and the depletion of natural resources are among its most significant environmental impacts.

These impacts can also have serious social and economic consequences, including the displacement of communities, the loss of livelihoods, increased food insecurity and health problems associated with pollution. Environmental degradation is widely recognised as one of the world's greatest challenges, as its effects are closely interconnected with other global issues such as climate change and biodiversity loss.

How can ecocide be prevented?

Preventing ecocide requires addressing the underlying causes of environmental degradation before damage becomes irreversible. Ecosystem restoration has also become a key tool for recovering degraded environments and strengthening nature's capacity to withstand future threats. According to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), restoring degraded ecosystems is essential for tackling biodiversity loss, climate change and land degradation in an integrated way.

Key measures for preventing ecocide include:

  • Strengthening environmental legislation and enforcement

    Robust legislation to protect ecosystems, together with effective monitoring and enforcement mechanisms, helps prevent activities that could cause serious environmental damage.

  • Carrying out environmental impact assessments

    Assessing the potential effects of infrastructure projects, industrial developments and extractive activities makes it possible to prevent or minimise their environmental impacts before they begin.

  • Protecting and restoring ecosystems

    Conserving natural habitats and restoring degraded environments helps safeguard biodiversity and strengthens ecosystems' ability to adapt to climate change.

  • Promoting sustainable supply chains

    Improving the traceability of raw materials and ensuring responsible practices throughout the value chain helps reduce the environmental risks associated with production.

  • Encouraging the circular economy

    Reducing resource consumption, reusing materials and minimising waste generation eases pressure on ecosystems and promotes the more efficient use of natural resources.

  • Strengthening environmental monitoring and risk management

    Monitoring systems, early warning mechanisms and forward planning help identify potential threats at an early stage and enable a more effective response to prevent large-scale environmental damage.